Select Page

GOP House Intel Committee Findings – No Russian/Trump Collusion found

GOP House Intel Committee Findings – No Russian/Trump Collusion found

In a findings that did not surprise anyone watching the so-called collusion story for the last year and a half, since the 2016 elections, the House GOP Intel Committee released their findings after looking through intelligence reports, interviewing almost a hundred witnesses and going through this for 14 months that there was no sign of any Russian and Trump campaign collusion.  In the same findings they also said there was no sign of any cooperation between the Clinton Campaign as well, nor could they find any evidence that provided any conclusive evidence that Russia favored Trump over Clinton, in fact, they like many felt Trump had no chance. Their goal was to spread distrust in the electoral system, in that they did a great job of achieving their goals. 

Naturally, the findings were rejected by CNN, claiming that the GOP handed Trump a present even though they couldn’t show one fault in the conclusions. Not to be outdone MSNBC came out with Chris Matthews condemning this, saying that the Democrats had a different view and the GOP was going to be embarrassed by all of this. New York Times claims that Muller’s case is growing in spite of the House Intel findings, of course, they could not point to any proof of collusion either. Time ran the usual rejection, and Newsweek chose to ignore what was not convenient to their narrative. 

Schiff has come out and said they have evidence that shows otherwise, naturally this is the same person that said the sky would fall if the GOP released their findings on the FICA court, then that he had evidence to discredit their findings, when the first release came out, no national security was affected, when his and the DNC report was released they tried to include so much sensitive material that Trump would not release it, thus they could scream he was hiding their damning article, Trump went around this, had the sensative parts redracted and released it, there was nothing in it. I have come to the conclusion that Adam Schiff is full of sh#$, and that is putting it nicely. This man is such a political hack it is hard to shift through his lies, they are so many. 

The Findings

Right now due to security concerns the findings will not be released until they have been gone over to make sure no security is compromised in the findings, but we did get an idea of what was contained in the findings by Rep. Conaway, he previewed several of the report’s conclusions.

“We found no evidence of collusion,” Conaway told reporters Monday, suggesting that those who believe there was are reading too many spy novels. “We found perhaps some bad judgment, inappropriate meetings, inappropriate judgment in taking meetings. But only Tom Clancy or Vince Flynn or someone else like that could take this series of inadvertent contacts with each other, or meetings or whatever, and weave that into sort of a fiction page-turner, spy thriller.”

The DNC with Schiff at their head has promised to release their findings that will show there is in fact findings that show definitive proof of collusion, of course, we have heard the same thing time after time before, and when the results come out from the DNC, you saw nothing. 

In the findings they said while they agreed with much of the intel agencies findings, they could not find any proof that Russia favored one side more than the other, this was just a political show, nothing more. 

We are still asking for contributions for Silent No More, we are trying to put the work togather on this, but funding is important, any help you can give will be helpful for making this possible.



Click on the banner to go to Go Fund Me Site to give to Silent No More!


About The Author

Timothy Benton

Student of history, a journalist for the last 2 years. Specialize in Middle East History, more specifically modern history with the Israeli Palestinian conflict. Also, a political commentator has been a lifetime fan of politics.

Leave a reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *